Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Week 4 Revised Action Plan

Revisions are posted in red.

Tool 7.1  Action Planning Template

Determine if the implementation of interactive whiteboards in core area classrooms has effected instruction by improving student-centered instruction, and encouraging student engagement?”

Goal:

Action Step(s) Person(s) Timeline: Needed Evaluation
Responsible Start/End Resources

Teacher survey

- Have any teacher with an interactive whiteboard complete a survey on their perceived skills, training they have received and plans to integrate into curriculum

-Survey will include an opportunity for teachers to list any training they felt they needed as the year starts.

Technology Director

August 16/

August 20

May 23/June3

SurveyMonkey account

Survey results

Administrator Field Notes

-Administrator training showcasing model lessons and what to look for during CWTs

-Campus administration will use classroom walkthroughs to document use of interactive whiteboards in lessons

Instructional Technologist/Curriculum Director

Assistant Superintendent

Campus Principals/Assistant Principals

August 18

Ongoing – 1 per teacher every six weeks 2 per teacher every six weeks

-Training room with interactive white board

-Eduphoria access

-Smart phone or Palm to conduct walkthrough

-Modified CWT template to reflect use of technology

-sign in sheet from training

Completed CWTs in Eduphoria

Interviews

-interview teachers in each core area and campus to determine their opinions of training availability and support

Technology Director/Curriculum Director

1st Six Weeks

4th Six Weeks

6th Six Weeks

Database software

Interviews catalogued in database software

Student survey

-Survey students to determine their perception of the lessons being taught on the interactive whiteboard, including how much time they are allowed to use the board

Technology Director

August 16/

August 20

May 23/June3

SurveyMonkey account

Survey results

Student achievement – Semester exams, TAKS results for tested subjects and CBA

District Testing Coordinator/Campus Administrators

CBAs – every six weeks

End of 1st Semester

April TAKS results

End of 2nd Semester

DMAC software

Test scores

Committee Meetings

Committee members: Technology Director, Curriculum Director, Campus Principals, Assistant Superintendent

Once each six weeks

Data collected

Meeting agendas

Help ticket tracking – track number of support requests from teachers regarding interactive whiteboards

Technology Director

June 3, 2010

Spiceworks help desk software

Help desk reports

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Week 3 Action Plan

Revisions are posted in red.

Tool 7.1  Action Planning Template

Determine if the implementation of interactive whiteboards in core area classrooms has effected instruction by improving student-centered instruction, and encouraging student engagement?”

Goal:

Action Step(s) Person(s) Timeline: Needed Evaluation
Responsible Start/End Resources

Teacher survey

- Have any teacher with an interactive whiteboard complete a survey on their perceived skills, training they have received and plans to integrate into curriculum

Technology Director

August 16/

August 20

May 23/June3

SurveyMonkey account

Survey results

Administrator Field Notes

-Campus administration will use classroom walkthroughs to document use of interactive whiteboards in lessons

Assistant Superintendent

Campus Principals/Assistant Principals

Ongoing – 1 per teacher every six weeks

-Eduphoria access

-Smart phone or Palm to conduct walkthrough

-Modified CWT template to reflect use of technology

Completed CWTs in Eduphoria

Interviews

-interview teachers in each core area and campus to determine their opinions of training availability and support

Technology Director/Curriculum Director

1st Six Weeks

4th Six Weeks

6th Six Weeks

Database software

Interviews catalogued in database software

Student survey

-Survey students to determine their perception of the lessons being taught on the interactive whiteboard, including how much time they are allowed to use the board

Technology Director

August 16/

August 20

May 23/June3

SurveyMonkey account

Survey results

Student achievement – Semester exams and TAKS results for tested subjects

District Testing Coordinator/Campus Administrators

End of 1st Semester

April TAKS results

End of 2nd Semester

DMAC software

Test scores

Committee Meetings

Committee members: Technology Director, Curriculum Director, Campus Principals, Assistant Superintendent

Once each six weeks

Data collected

Meeting agendas

Help ticket tracking – track number of support requests from teachers regarding interactive whitboards

Technology Director

June 3, 2010

Spiceworks help desk software

Help desk reports

Monday, July 12, 2010

Week 2 Reflection

As I listened to the interviews and read the textbook this week, it struck me just how important data is to the success of a school. All three interviews stressed not only the importance of administrators conducting action research, but the importance of teachers conducting it as well. Teachers must also be aware of how to use research data to improve their instruction. For districts to be successful, they must train their teachers how to disaggregate data and apply the results to their instruction. Finding the action research topic that is most meaningful to you is not easy. When I was working on the proposals for part 3 of the assignment, I found myself quickly veering off topic, or developing a proposal that was too vague or large to reasonably study. This is where brainstorming with my mentor really became valuable. Working together, we were able to form my ideas into reasonable and valuable research topics. Each proposal would provide the district with critical data. At that point, it was difficult to pick which I felt was the most important to pursue. I finally settled on the topic I felt was most relevant to my current position.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Week 1 - Action Research

After reading about action research this week, I found myself thinking that, if all the research projects I had to do over the course of high school and college had been personally relevant to me, I might have enjoyed doing them more. To me, I think that this is the key to the success and importance of action research. It is research being carried out by the very people who will benefit from the research. A principal and their leadership who carry out an action research project will not only have a unique insight into the issues they are studying that an outsider will not have, but they will also be able to see first hands the results of their work. Another benefit is that it forces administrators to truly focus on a problem. Although I am not a campus principal, as a district administrator I understand just how chaotic and stressful it can be to work in an administrative role. I find myself writing little notes to remind myself to research this issue or program. Often times, this research never happens because other fires need to be put out. In my position, I think I could benefit from performing action research. In technology, so often we implement new hardware or software and there is little research done afterwards to judge its success. The whole point of action research is to gather data over time, analyze the data and make adjustments to processes and plans based on this data. This is beneficial at a campus level for instruction, and is also beneficial at a district level. In my case, its beneficial because I would have real data to either support the continued use of certain technology, or to show that we need to change what we are doing in relations to technology in the district. I found the comparison of action inquiry to a doctor searching for a diagnosis enlightening. The description of how a doctor works towards a diagnosis in comparison to a principal using numerous data sources to reach a solution really helped clarify what action research and inquiry is all about needed (Harris, Edmonson & Combs, 2010). I can clearly see how action research is a step by step process, where some steps may be revisited time and again as we search for a positive solution.

Harris, S., Edmonson, S., & Combs, J. (2009). Examining what we do to improve our schools: 9 steps from analysis to action. Larchmont, N.Y.: Eye on Education.

Blogging as an Educational Leader
One thing I have found as an administrator is that I rarely have time to myself to really reflect upon my day and what I did or did not accomplish. If I were to set aside time each week to blog about my work, even if no one else reads the post, it would be a great opportunity to basically do a "brain dump" of all those things running around in my head. It would allow me to visually see what I have been working on, prioritize my responsibilities and work through lingering problems. An even better scenario is to have colleagues read my blog and post comments. While Information Technology is a separate department, we cannot be successful without keeping close communication ties with the campuses. On the flip side, if the campus principals and Superintendent wrote blogs that I could access and comment on, I would have an insight into the problems they are facing and perhaps even situations where I might be able to provide assistance. Often times as administrators we get so bogged down in our duties that we forget to come up for air and ask for help. A simple solution may only be a phone call away, but sometimes we forget to make it. If all district administrators participated in blogging, it would be another way to open the lines of communication and perhaps strengthen us as a team.